Cross-comparative Analysis of Frequentist and Bayesian Perspectives on Failure Time Distributions
Abstract
In reliability analysis, both the Weibull and the lognormal distributions could be analyzed using the observed data logarithms. While the Weibull data logarithm is skewed, the lognormal data logarithm is symmetrical. This review work initiates discussions on and syntheses of the various views held on the use of the frequentist and Bayesian approaches to drawing statistical inferences on failure time distributions of survival models. Of greater concern was the discussion on the use of the exponential, Weibull and log-normal distributions in reliability analysis. Various methods have been used to discriminate between the two most important distributions. They include: Coefficients of variation (CV); the standard deviation of the data logarithms (SD); the percentile position of the mean of the data logarithm (PP); the cumulated logarithm dispersion before and after the mean (CLD); ratio of the maximum likelihood (RML); Kullback-Leibler Divergence (KLD); and Minimized Kullback-Leibler Divergence (RMKLD). In the (CV, SD, PP and CLD) study, a stress-strength data set was used for the analysis. The stress data followed a lognormal distribution, while the strength data followed a Weibull distribution, therefore for the stress-strength analysis the lognormal-Weibull combination was used. In the ratio of the maximum likelihood (RML) study, it was averred that though each of the distributions had great applications, none of them produced a good fit. In the study using Kullback-Leibler Divergence (KLD); and Minimized Kullback-Leibler Divergence (RMKLD), test results revealed that RML=0.345>0. Hence the lognormal distribution was selected. Similarly, the RMKLD=0.6028>0, therefore the Weibull distribution was selected. In the final analysis, none of the study results could reject the Weibull in favour of the lognormal distribution model. In respect of the frequentist and the Bayesian approach to conducting statistical inferences, it came out strongly that it was high time psychologist who had adopted the use of the frequentist framework moved away from it and started using the Bayesian approach. A shift towards the use of the Bayesian, lognormal-Weibull approach is thus recommendable.
References
S. Selvin, Survival Analysis for Epidemiology and Medical Research: A Practical Guide, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2008.
S. F. Morris, Confidence Limits - Exponential Distribution, Reliability Analytics Corporation, 2017
J. Kensler, and L. Cortes, Interpreting confidence intervals, Scientific Test and Analysis Techniques Center of Excellence (STAT COE), 24 December 2014.
D. R. Cox, Some problems connected with statistical inference, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 29 (1958), 357-372. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177706618
R. T. Cox, Probability, frequency and reasonable expectation, The American Journal of Physics 14 (1946), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1990764
A. P. Dawid, Statistical theory: The prequential approach, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 147 (1984), 278-292. https://doi.org/10.2307/2981683
B. De Finetti, Theory of Probability, Vols. 1 and 2, Wiley, New York, 1974. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2288-0_1
S. Dennis and M. S. Humphreys, A context noise model of episodic word recognition, Psychological Review 108 (2001), 452-477. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.452
J. O. Berger, Could Fisher, Jeffreys and Neyman have agreed on testing?, Statistical Science 18 (2003), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1056397485
R. Christensen, Testing Fisher, Neyman, Pearson, and Bayes, The American Statistician 59 (2005), 121-126. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313005X20871
E. T. Lee, Statistical Methods for Survival Data, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Inc., 1980.
J. D. Kalbfleisch and R. L. Prentice, The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time data, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1980.
J. F. Lawless, Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1982.
T. Vaughan, In search of the memoryless property, Conference: Proceedings of the 2008 Winter Simulation Conference, Global Gateway to Discovery, WSC 2008, InterContinental Hotel, Miami, Florida, USA, December 7-10, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2008.4736369
H.-P. Blossfeld and G. Rohwer, Techniques of Event History Modeling, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1995, pp. 667-694.
A. Kurniawan, N. Avicena and E. Ana, Estimation of the shape parameter of Weibull distribution based on type ii censored data using EM algorithm, AIP Conference Proceedings 2264 (2020), 030011. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0025681
H. Fei, F. Kong and Y. Tang, Estimation for two-parameter Weibull distribution and extreme-value distribution under multiply type-II censoring, Journal Communication in Statistics-Theory and Methods 24 (1995), 2087-2104. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610929508831604
F. G. Akgul and B. Senoglu, Estimation of stress-strength reliability for Weibull distribution based on type-II right censored ranked set sampling data, Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research 14 (2018), 781-806. https://doi.org/10.18187/pjsor.v14i4.2239
V. Sujatha, R. Ravanan and M. Ramakrishnan, Point and interval estimates of Weibull distribution to progressively type ii censored data by order statistics approach, International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering 6 (2010), 370-374.
H. Panahi and S. Asadi, Estimation of the Weibull distribution based on type-II censored samples, Journal Applied Mathematical Statistics 5 (2011), 2549-2558.
G. S. Mudholkar, D. K. Srivastava and G. D. Kollia, A generalization of the Weibull distribution with application to the analysis of survival data, Journal of the American Statistical Association 91 (1996), 1575-1583. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1996.10476725
A. J. Hallinan, Jr., A review of the Weibull distribution, Journal of Quality Technology 25 (1993), 85-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1993.11979431
S. Çelebioğlu, On an extension of the exponential and Weibull distributions, SDU Journal of Science (E-Journal) 5 (2010), 137-146.
S. A. Thamrin, M. N. Zoraida, A. K. Jaya and Ansariadi, Performance of Bayesian using conjugate prior estimator for Weibull right censored survival data, Asian Journal of Scientific Research 11 (2018), 376-382. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajsr.2018.376.382
A. O. M. Ahmed, N. A. Ibrahim, J. Arasan and M. B. Adam, Extension of Jeffreys’s prior estimate for Weibull censored data using Lindley’s approximation, Aust. J. Basic Applied Sci. 5 (2011), 884-889.
A. O. M. Ahmed and N. A. Ibrahim, Bayesian survival estimator for Weibull distribution with censored data, J. Applied Sci. 11 (2011), 393-396. https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2011.393.396
S. A. Thamrin, J. M. McGree and K. L. Mengersen, Bayesian Weibull survival model for gene expression data, in: Case Studies in Bayesian Statistical Modelling and Analysis, W.A. Shewhart, S.S. Wilks, C.L. Alston, K.L. Mengersen and A.N. Pettitt, eds., Wiley, New York, 2013, pp. 171-185. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118394472.ch10
M. Hamada, A. Wilson, C. S. Reese and H. Martz, Bayesian Reliability, New York: Springer, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77950-8
L. D. Walker, Hypothesis Tests and Proofs, Encyclopedia of Social Measurement (2005), 265-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-369398-5/00019-0
E. J. Wagenmakers, M. Lee, T. Lodewyckx and G. J. Iverson, Bayesian versus frequentist inference, in: Bayesian Evaluation of Informative Hypotheses, Springer, New York, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09612-4_9
M. Harman, Practical Bayesian Analysis of Failure Time Data, STAT COE-Report-10-2017. https://www.afit.edu/stat/statcoe_files/Practical_Bayesian_Analysis_for_Failure_Time_Data_Best_Practice.pdf
J. F. Ortiz-Yañez and M. R. Piña-Monarrez, Discrimination between the lognormal and Weibull distributions by using multiple linear regression, DYNA 85 (2018), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v85n205.66658
D. Kundu and A. Manglick, Discriminating between the Weibull and log‐normal distributions, Naval Research Logistics 51 (2004), 893-905. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.20029
A. A. Bromideh, Discriminating between Weibull and log-normal distributions based on Kullback-Leibler divergence, Istanbul University Econometrics and Statistics e-Journal 16 (2012), 44-54.
Coşkun Kuş, A. Pekgör and I. Kinaci, Discriminating between the lognormal and Weibull distributions under progressive censoring, Cumhuriyet Science Journal 40 (2019), 493-504. https://doi.org/10.17776/csj.470148
F. Bartolucci and L. Scrucca, Point estimation methods with applications to item response theory models, International Encyclopedia of Education (Third Edition) (2010), 366-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01376-2
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.